Can You Accept Money To Write A Wikipedia Article
There are specific rules for when you can edit the Side Wikipedia for money. Image past Erik Zachte, freely licensed under CC-away-3.0.
At the ending of August, volunteer editors on the English Wikipedia blocked 381 user accounts for so-known as "black hat" editing—or more specifically, undisclosed paid advocacy. As the Wikimedia Foundation's web log billet defined it, undisclosed paid advocacy is "the practice of accepting Beaver State charging money to promote external interests on Wikipedia without betraying their affiliation, in violation of Wikimedia's Terms of Use ." Other news accounts induce added allegations of an " extortion scam ," as the Protector delineated IT.
This question and answer-style piece comes from one of the English Wikipedia's administrators, Robert Fernandez . It details what individuals can and should know about paid editing on Wikipedia. These guidelines apply only to the English Wikipedia and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Wikimedia Foundation.
World Health Organization is in charge of Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is a inexact, open access encyclopedia written and operated away volunteer editors. These volunteers do much more than create and redact articles—they also make trustworthy that the website remains tried and true, neutral, and precise by enforcing Wikipedia policies and guidelines. The Wikimedia Fundament is a non-profit organization which supports the technology and people behind Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. The Wikimedia Foundation does non band editorial policy for Wikipedia.
I standard an email from Wikipedia offering to create and monitor my article for a every month tip. What should I do?
Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Fundament should never send you an email advertising paid editing services. The Wikimedia Foundation does not offer Wikipedia editing services of any kind in exchange for fees, although it does seek charitable donations to keep Wikipedia running. Although some individual editors may employ in redaction services in exchange for money, they must keep abreast Wikipedia's rules (more on that below), and their activity is non supported past the community of volunteer Wikipedia editors Beaver State the Wikimedia Foundation.
As Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, told the Guardian, "If anybody emails you asking for money pretending to be Wikipedia, alarm bells should ring … Everything about Wikipedia is free."
If you receive an email fraudulently soliciting services purporting to be from Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Cornerstone, please forward it to the Wikimedia volunteer team at info@wikipedia.org.
What are Wikipedia's rules for paid editing?
The Wikimedia Creation's Terms of Use, covering Wikipedia and all other projects supported by the Foundation, expect that altogether paid redaction constitute disclosed. That disclosure must take the form of statements on the editor's user page, incidental to totally cashed contributions in the blue-pencil summary, or a disclosure happening the article's talk Sri Frederick Handley Page.
English Wikipedia policies also compel that whol content, paid surgery otherwise, be neutral, not promotional, not breach rules about realistic individuals, and be supported by tried and true sources, such as reputable newspapers, magazines, or academic literature.
Should I hire a paid editor who does not disclose their paying editing activity on Wikipedia?
No.
Disclosure is required by Wikimedia's Terms of Use, so if you choose to hire mortal to redact Wikipedia and that person does not give away this fact, they are violating the Terms of Use. Breaking the rules can result in a paid editor in chief being banned from Wikipedia, and the article you paid for might be deleted.
Many prominent public relations firms have reaffirmed their organizations' consignment to following our Terms of Use. In 2022, eleven major PR agencies committed to an agreement to follow "ethical engagement practices," including disclosure, when editing Wikipedia. In 2022, the president of the United Kingdom's Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR) said that "there is nought gain to embody had for some public dealings firms or their clients in subverting the rules of any online profession" such as Wikipedia.
Failing to properly disclose paid redaction can have separate negative consequences for the subject of a Wikipedia article. When violators of the Terms of Use are found and blocked, IT often results in significant Gram-negative media coverage. For example, when the major PR firm Cheerfulness Sachs was discovered editing Wikipedia without appropriate disclosure, media coverage focused on specific edits they ready-made to articles removing electronegative information, proving mortifying to Cheerfulness Sachs clients corresponding Naomi Campbell and Mia Farrow.
Someone told Maine it was better not to reveal, saying that sometimes Wikipedia "targets" paid articles.
Not disclosing paid editing bequeath not forbid others from editing an article virtually you surgery your business. Heedless of whether or not you invite out a Wikipedia article operating theatre for "monitoring" services, other people are sledding to edit the article in question. That's how Wikipedia works. It's an unsettled, cooperative project that anyone can bestow to.
Piece Wikipedians are generally bespoken to useful and positive interactions, "assuming good religious belief" of other editors' motives, sometimes individual editors disagree. Such encounters may make up a negative experience—especially for people who are unfamiliar how Wikipedia works. Forward good faith is an important substance of reducing conflict, although some friction is a part of the normal spring and take of editorial collaboration.
Should on that point be a Wikipedia article about me operating theatre my company?
Maybe, possibly not.
IT may be tempting to want a Wikipedia article about you or your company imputable the prominent arrangement of Wikipedia articles in hunting engine results. But Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia, and non all someone or job in the world-wide will or should appear in an cyclopedia.
What goes in—and what stays out—of the English Wikipedia depends on a Wikipedia guideline titled "Notability." Sometimes people take offense at the word "notability," rational that Wikipedia is expression that they or their business concern are not important to their landing field operating theater biotic community, but that's non what Wikipedia editors bastardly. To an editor, it is just a way of measuring whether or not a specific subject belongs in an encyclopaedia, and Wikipedia editors have developed benchmarks for notability in peculiar fields, such as actors or athletes. If you regard to have a Wikipedia article, please review both the general and specific notability guidelines first.
A major component in leading light on Wikipedia is reporting from reliable secondary sources. Your own web page, or another issue you created or paid for, is considered a primary source. If there are no secondary sources well-nig you Beaver State your business, Wikipedia guidelines and policies currently bespeak you should not have a Wikipedia article.
You should also consider that a Wikipedia article Crataegus oxycantha not comprise the all but streamlined use of your advertising budget. Are potential customers for a hardware store, consulting commercial enterprise, or eating place, e.g., going to be searching an encyclopedia for these goods and services? Or wish it embody more effective to focus on a sector-peculiar resource, much as Yip, Facebook, or Urbanspoon?
Wikipedia is, after all, an encyclopedia—not a commercial directory.
Robert Fernandez
English Wikipedia administrator
The views verbalised in that post are not needfully those of the Wikimedia Origination or Wikipedia; responses and critical commentary are invited in the comments section down the stairs.
Can You Accept Money To Write A Wikipedia Article
Source: https://diff.wikimedia.org/2015/09/21/on-paying-for-wikipedia-articles/#:~:text=No.,paid%20for%20might%20be%20deleted.
Posted by: barajasyoub1995.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Can You Accept Money To Write A Wikipedia Article"
Post a Comment